Starfleet Academy: Cancellation, Gatekeeping, and the Cycle of Fandom
Starfleet Academy has been cancelled after just two seasons. I enjoyed this show and was
initially upset that it will not be extended. Even though I wasn't the primary target audience,
I found it interesting and entertaining. I especially liked the diversity and representation
among the characters. This is something that is always important for me in the Star Trek shows.
I could keep writing about what was good and not so good in the show, but there are plenty of
reviews on the internet already. The cancellation made me think about a larger concept: the
divide in the fandom. Similarly to what happened recently with Discovery, some fans became very
vocal about how much they didn't like the show and why it isn't "real Star Trek."
This need to express disapproval, to engage in gatekeeping, and to pass judgment on different
shows is something that has always puzzled me. We live in an era where this behavior is more
visible than ever. Social Media algorithms are designed to prioritize drama; they are engineered
to generate an emotional reaction, positioning content that will keep users' attention longer.
Allowing companies behind platforms to show more ads and earn more money. Clickbait titles and
rage-posting create a false view of reality. It often looks like there is more hate, more
dislike, and more division than really exists in the real world. This isn't unique to Star Trek.
It's how the internet has functioned for the last decade, and we can see these same patterns
used to influence politics. While modern technology enables this on a massive scale, the
underlying psychological mechanisms are known and have been used for years.
Some readers may not be aware of this, but pretty much every Star Trek show after The Original
Series (TOS) was met with initial hostility:
- TNG: "No Kirk? No Spock? This isn't Trek!" Some fans hated the beige bridge, the "weak" captain who preferred diplomacy to punching, and the lack of conflict. It found its voice in Season 3 and redefined sci-fi for a whole generation.
- DS9: "They aren't even trekking! It's a hotel in space." Critics called it too dark, too religious, and too stationary. It is now widely considered the best-written series for its complex, serialized arcs.
- Voyager: "A female captain? This is political." People also hated that the ship looked "too sleek" and that the survival stakes weren't high enough. It became a massive hit in syndication, and Janeway is now an undisputed icon.
- Enterprise: "The theme song is pop music! Temporal Cold War? This ruins the timeline!" After it was cancelled, fans realized it was actually a gritty, grounded look at humanity's first steps into the cosmos.
Introducing the Cycle: From Hate to Love
The history I've laid out above clearly illustrates a repetitive pattern, which I've conceptualized in this infographic: "The Star Trek Fan Reception Cycle: From Hate to Love."
As you follow the visual timeline, you can see how a new series, which initially triggers an 'outrage' phase (Phase 1) focused on tone, canon, or diverse representation, eventually progresses through acceptance, rediscovery (Phase 3), and long-term reverence (Phase 4). When you see Discovery and Starfleet Academy listed in Phase 1, remember that Deep Space Nine was stuck in that same red panel in 1993, being told it wasn't 'real Trek' because it was stationary. The entire cycle is a loop, as the revered 'Benchmark' series (like TNG or DS9) are then used by critics to attack the next new show. Understanding this cycle takes the power away from the noisy, algorithmic anger and reveals it as a predictable phase of fandom, not an endpoint.
The Power of Positivity and "Trektivism"
For every hater who is desperate to broadcast their anger, there are hundreds of fans who watch the show in silence. Some love it, some enjoy it, and some think it's weak. And that's ok. Everyone has a right to their favorite show, character, and everyone has a right to not like certain episodes or series. We are all different, and different parts of the franchise work for different people. I'm not a big fan of the Section 31 movie or Star Trek Scouts, but I understand I am not the target audience, and there are people who really like these shows. I will not try to persuade them to stop liking them or celebrate if shows get cancelled.In 60 years of the Star Trek franchise, there is room for an infinite variety of stories, characters, and artistic expressions. If we only kept retelling Kirk's adventures, Star Trek would be a relic of the past - as dead as McGyver or MASH*.
This ability to tackle complex, progressive ideas is the foundation of Trektivism, which I define as the active pursuit of a more peaceful, logical, and inclusive future, inspired by the ideals of Star Trek. My time engaging with fans has taught me that the core of this community isn't built on anger; it is made of inspiring, curious, and logic-driven people who want to make the world better. This gives me enormous hope.
We must remember that while the hate cycle exists, the good news is that the positive cycle of rediscovery is just as powerful. Shows that were considered weak when they first broadcast will most likely be rediscovered as essential chapters, just like Deep Space Nine was. I am staying positive and deeply grateful that we have so much content to explore and debate. My hope is that the fandom can become less reactive and more responding - modeling the understanding we are meant to champion.
So, to summarize: if you don't like something, don't watch it, but don't feel the need to broadcast your anger. And if you do like something, that's great! Rewatch it, deep dive into the lore, and simply have fun with it. Your personal preference does not make your favorite episodes any less meaningful to the rest of the galaxy. Let's be more understanding to each other, prioritize the positive, and stay focused on the future.
Live long and prosper. 🖖❤️
Check out other Star Trek articles in the blog section.